Center for Sustainable Logistics and Supply Chains (CSLS)

Center for Sustainable Logistics and Supply Chains (CSLS)

Making supply chains and logistics operations more sustainable through research and education. 

The Center for Sustainable Logistics and Supply Chains (CSLS) is driving the shift to more sustainable logistics and supply chains. Building on KLU's expertise in sustainability-focused logistics research, CSLS collaborates with key players—companies, policymakers, and NGOs—to position Hamburg as a global hub for sustainable logistics knowledge. Our work zeroes in on three critical areas: (1) decarbonizing logistics, (2) promoting closed-loop supply chains and the circular economy, and (3) enhancing corporate sustainability. Every research project, outreach program, and professional training initiative at CSLS is designed to address one or more of these key areas. To learn more about our activities, feel free to reach out to the CSLS directors, Prof. Dr. Moritz Petersen and Prof. Dr. Johannes Meuer.

Events

Skill-building and professional trainings

At KLU, the CSLS offers various tailored education and skill-building programs on sustainability strategy, sustainable logistics and supply chains.

Our SuMO program provides professionals with the chance to learn about sustainable management and make a real impact. It's a part-time program that offers flexible learning options and combines scientific expertise with a holistic perspective on sustainability. With a blend of online modules and interactive on-campus sessions in Hamburg, it optimizes your time for effective learning. Learn more!

The Summer School in Sustainability comprises workshops and lectures with outstanding international lecturers, excursions in the logistics metropolis Hamburg and an attractive supporting program. A balanced mix of theory and practice and highly motivated participants from all corporate sectors make the seminar an exciting experience. Learn more!

The Carbon Accounting Workshop is an intensive, hands-on master class designed for individuals and organizations eager to master carbon accounting. It gives a chance to dive deep into current standards and reporting frameworks, including EU regulations, the GHG protocol, ISO norms, and the GLEC framework. Also to gain strategic and operational insights essential for developing a robust carbon accounting system. During the course, you will interactively tackle a practical case study, calculating emissions of a product's journey from raw material to final distribution. You will gather relevant data to quantify emissions for each leg, applying appropriate methodologies for different modes of transport. This practical experience will enhance your ability to critically assess supply chain emission calculations, classify varying data quality, and evaluate various carbon accounting approaches. Conclude your journey with a discussion with global policy experts on regulatory trends and the future of carbon accounting.

Learn more!

Team

Profile image

Prof. Dr. Johannes Meuer

Associate Professor for Sustainability Strategy and Operations, Co-Director Center for Sustainable Logistics and Supply Chains

Kühne Logistics University - KLU

View profile

Profile image

Prof. Dr. Moritz Petersen

Associate Professor of Sustainable Supply Chain Practice, Co-Director Center for Sustainable Logistics and Supply Chains

Kühne Logistics University - KLU

View profile

Profile image

Prof. Alan C. McKinnon, PhD

Professor of Logistics

Kühne Logistics University - KLU

View profile

Profile image

Prof. Dr. Andreas Kilian Gernert

Assistant Professor for Sustainable Operations

Kühne Logistics University - KLU

View profile

Profile image

Prof. Dr. Franziska Lauenstein

Assistant Professor of Strategy

View profile

Profile image

Dr. Felipe Alexandre de Lima

Post-doctoral Researcher

Kühne Logistics University - KLU

View profile

Profile image

Ramón van Almsick

PhD Candidate

Kühne Logistics University - KLU

View profile

Profile image

Michael Ntiriakwa

PhD Candidate

Kühne Logistics University - KLU

View profile

Profile image

Andrés Felipe Rey

PhD Candidate

Kühne Logistics University - KLU

View profile

Profile image

Dounia Chlyeh

PhD Candidate

Kühne Logistics Univeristy - KLU

View profile

Profile image

Dr. Elaheh Nosrati Rad

Educational Developer/ Project Manager (CSLS)

Kühne Logistics University - KLU

Affiliate Members

Profile image

Prof. Dr. Alexa Burmester

Associate Professor of Applied Quantitative Methods at KLU

Kühne Logistics University - KLU

View profile

Profile image

Prof. Dr. Gordon Wilmsmeier

Associate Professor for Shipping and Global Logistics, Director of the Hapag-Lloyd Center for Shipping and Global Logistics (CSGL)

Kühne Logistics University - KLU

View profile

Profile image

Prof. Dr. Sandra Transchel

Professor for Supply Chain and Operations Management

Kühne Logistics University - KLU

View profile

Profile image

Prof. Dr. Shushu Liao

Assistant Professor of Finance

Kühne Logistics University - KLU

View profile

Profile image

Prof. Marcos Ritel, PhD

Assistant Professor for International Trade

Kühne Logistics University - KLU

View profile

Profile image

Robin Kabelitz-Bock

PhD Candidate

Kühne Logistics University - KLU

View profile

Profile image

Lara Pomaska

PhD Candidate

Kühne Logistics University - KLU

View profile

Profile image

Jonah Blits

PhD Candidate

Kühne Logistics University - KLU

View profile

Alumni Team Members

Profile image

Dr. Sandra Luttermann

Senior Scientist

View profile

Profile image

Moritz Jäger-Roschko

Kampaigner Ressourcenschutz und Kreislaufwirtschaft

Greenpeace Deutschland

View profile

Profile image

Duncan Mc Geough

PhD Candidate

Kühne Logistics University - KLU

View profile

Selected Publications

Abstract: We conduct an experiment to examine how providing decision makers with high vs. low peer performance information influences choices between exploration and exploitation. Previous work on organization-level learning suggests a high-performing peer would fuel exploration, while a low-performing peer would dampen it. In line with this, we find that individuals who receive information about a high-performing peer explore more than those who receive information about a low-performing peer. However, we also find that, compared to individuals with a low tendency to self-enhance, individuals with a high tendency to self-enhance are less likely to explore when receiving information about a high-performing peer. In fact, these individuals explore at levels comparable to those who receive information about a low-performing peer. We explain this behavioral pattern by demonstrating that, as individuals learn and improves, information about a high-performing peer increasingly results in mixed performance feedback; under these conditions of relative interpretive flexibility, exploration is moderated by decision makers’ tendency to self-enhance. When these individual dynamics are aggregated, our data suggest that an organization that provides peer performance information may experience either the same or less exploration than an organization that does not, with the exact difference depending on its proportion of high self-enhancers. These insights into the contingencies and aggregate effects of how individuals interpret and respond to peer performance information are particularly relevant given recent interest in designing organizations that shape employee behavior through the provision of feedback, rather than through traditional instruments of coordination and control such as incentives or hierarchy.

Export record: Citavi Endnote RIS ISI BibTeX WordXML

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266231162057 

Abstract: The transition toward the circular economy requires stakeholders to collaborate along value chains. Yet, such collaborations are considerably challenging. Given the paradigmatic change, stakeholders face high levels of uncertainty and also need to align on a common way forward. We extend research on interorganizational sensemaking and the circular economy by exploring the process of interorganizational alignment in a European consortium of over 150 companies representing the value chain for flexible packaging with the objective to transform the value chain from linear to circular. We find that the interorganizational sensemaking process unfolds across three levels—organization, value chain, and ecosystem—which provide different reference frames for the process. We provide insights into how these frames, power dynamics, and identity considerations influence this process. Our findings highlight the importance of considering interdependencies between stakeholders and a collective reconceptualization of the established value chain to successfully transition toward a circular one.

Export record: Citavi Endnote RIS ISI BibTeX WordXML

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13986 

Abstract: To maintain future supplier competition, manufacturers may support financially distressed suppliers by sourcing from them, even if they are less efficient than competitors, and by procuring larger quantities from them at higher prices. We analyze these strategies in a model in which a manufacturer decides for one of two available suppliers, supplier bankruptcy risk is endogenous, and financial distress can lead to internal or external reorganization. Following bankruptcy, the remaining supplier may serve as a backup option. Our research identifies settings in which the manufacturer should support the distressed supplier. We also find that in some cases, a nondistressed supplier may charge price premiums due to its competitor's distress, while in other cases, it may use predatory pricing to drive its competitor into bankruptcy. We complement our results with a small case study and show how our model can explain patterns observed in industry.

Export record: Citavi Endnote RIS ISI BibTeX WordXML

Abstract: The study of freight transport has been subject to a long-term paradigm shift since the 1970s as the movement of freight has increasingly been researched as an integral part of logistics systems and supply chains. It has also benefited from the development of logistics and supply chain management as a business activity and academic discipline. This paper outlines the history of this 'logistification' of freight transport research, examining its impact on the modelling of freight flows and its relevance to a series of major transport policy issues, and discusses the methodological implications of this reorientation and diversification of the field.

Export record: Citavi Endnote RIS ISI BibTeX WordXML

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12484 

Abstract: Should a firm, which seeks to subcontract a new product development project, leverage competition among potential suppliers and ask all of them to engage in research and development in parallel? Or should it first invite offers and commit to the supplier with the best offer, before only this supplier engages in development? Building on analytical literature on both formats, we apply game theory to answer these questions. We identify Bayesian Nash equilibrium strategies and characterize advantages of both formats. We find that having multiple suppliers engage in new product development in parallel is favored only if enough suppliers can be attracted, which is the case when development uncertainty and learning benefits are high. The participation decision also depends on the specific structure of the project's development costs. If administrative overhead and material costs are substantial, while engaging in development and exerting effort is relatively cheap but does not offer many learning opportunities, the number of suppliers who would be willing to engage in parallel development is limited. First inviting offers and selecting the best supplier to exclusively engage in new product development then becomes more attractive for the buyer. We discuss further implications and characterize environments that may foster more innovativeness in this context.

Export record: Citavi Endnote RIS ISI BibTeX WordXML

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1130 

Abstract: Companies that seek to improve their operational performance by adopting new practices often report disappointing adoption rates. The literature concerning practice adoption has tended to focus on efficacy and legitimacy drivers at the organizational level. However, there exists convincing evidence that practice adoption largely depends on the commitment of those managers involved in the adoption of a given practice. Thus, we investigate what prompts operations managers to commit to practice adoption. We draw on the theory of planned behavior to explore the cognitive foundations of 76 operations managers' commitment to new operational practices. Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis, we identify three belief configurations associated with high levels of commitment—“the Follower,” “the Pragmatist,” and “the Reformer.” We contribute a behavioral operations perspective to the literature on practice adoption by providing an individual-level and configurational view of managerial commitment to change.

Export record: Citavi Endnote RIS ISI BibTeX WordXML

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2019-0181 

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore how big-picture sustainability strategies are translated into tangible product development efforts. The authors assert that most sustainable products currently remain confined to niche markets and do not permeate the mainstream. The authors propose that there is a missing link between strategic sustainability goals and operational product development initiatives. The authors establish a path to bridging this gap. Design/methodology/approach The manuscript is based on a qualitative research design with a sample of 32 companies. Data were collected from semi-structured interviews with product developers as well as secondary data analysis. Findings The authors delineate three empirically derived approaches firms from the sample pursue to develop sustainable products. The authors identify a phenomenon that the authors’ call the fallacy of trickle-down product sustainability. The authors find that only one of the three approaches – codification – is equipped to successfully turn strategic sustainability targets into authentic sustainable products. Practical implications This study provides an actionable guide to executives and product developers with respect to bridging the gap between often elusive sustainability aspirations and tangible product improvements via the process of rigorous codification. Originality/value This study provides a novel and unique perspective into strategy, sustainability and product development. The authors synthesize the extant literature on sustainable product development, juxtapose the emergent structure with primary interview data, and elaborate the resource-based view (RBV) to provide theoretical and practical implications. The authors establish scalability as the missing RBV capability of many attempts toward mass–market compatibility of more sustainable products.

Export record: Citavi Endnote RIS ISI BibTeX WordXML

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619850180 

Abstract: Scholarly and managerial interest in corporate sustainability has increased significantly in the past two decades. However, the field is increasingly criticized for failing to effectively contribute to sustainable development and for its limited impact on managerial practice. We argue that this criticism arises due to a fundamental ambiguity around the nature of corporate sustainability. To address the lack of concept clarity, we conduct a systematic literature review and identify 33 definitions of corporate sustainability. Adopting the Aristotelian perspective on definitions, one that promotes reducing concepts to their essential attributes, we discern four components of corporate sustainability. These components offer a conceptual space of inquiry that, while being parsimonious, offers nuanced understanding of the dimensions along which definitions of corporate sustainability differ. We discuss implications for research and practice and outline several recommendations for how advancements in construct clarity may lead to a better scholarly understanding of corporate sustainability.

Export record: Citavi Endnote RIS ISI BibTeX WordXML

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2914262 

Abstract: Human factors, such as an individual's competences and attitudes, have a decisive impact on the results of product development processes, especially in companies with small product development teams. Sustainability considerations further amplify this impact as such a multifaceted issue results in an extra layer of product requirements and hard-to-make decisions on tradeoffs. This paper explores the interplay of corporate sustainability and the individual approaches product developers exhibit toward improving product sustainability. For this purpose, a grounded theory study in the German consumer goods industry is conducted. Thirty-two expert interviews with product development managers and extensive secondary data are collected and analyzed. It is found that the corporate sustainability approach heavily influences how developers comprehend sustainability and how they conceptualize it for their product portfolio. Explicitly, the products considered for sustainability improvements, their innovation level, and the use of design stereotypes to signal sustainability improvements emerge as key decision levers. The findings emphasize that the human factors in the context of product development, specifically concerning sustainability, warrant more academic attention. Also, it is demonstrated that companies need to be aware of the organizational environment which they are providing for their developers when pushing for product sustainability.

Export record: Citavi Endnote RIS ISI BibTeX WordXML

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116665465 

Abstract: Mixed methods systematically combine multiple research approaches—either in basic parallel, sequential, or conversion designs or in more complex multilevel or integrated designs. Multilevel mixed designs are among the most valuable and dynamic. Yet current multilevel designs, which are rare in the mixed methods literature, do not strongly integrate qualitative and quantitative approaches for use in one study. This lack of integration is particularly problematic for research in the organization sciences because of the variety of multilevel concepts that researchers study. In this article, we develop a multilevel mixed methods technique that integrates qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) with hierarchical linear modeling (HLM). This technique is among the first of the multilevel ones to integrate qualitative and quantitative methods in a single research design. Using Miles and Snow’s typology of generic strategies as an example of organizational configurations, we both illustrate how researchers may apply this technique and provide recommendations for its application and potential extensions. Our technique offers new opportunities for bridging macro and micro inquiries by developing strong inferences for testing, refining, and extending multilevel theories of organizational configurations.

Export record: Citavi Endnote RIS ISI BibTeX WordXML