How to design surveys and experiments for top tier publishing

(Note: We require that you read the literature that is written in bold)

• Antonakis, J. (2017). On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications. Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 5–21.  http://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.01.006
• Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. (2016). A critical review and best-practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 229–283. http://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12103
• Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2016). Boundary conditions: What they are, how to explore them, why we need them, and when to consider them. Organizational Research Methods.  http://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191
• Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
• Jacoby, J., & Sassenberg, K. (2011). Interactions do not only tell us when, but can also tell us how: Testing process hypotheses by interaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 180–190.  http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.762
• Mortensen, C. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Full-cycle social psychology for theory and application. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(1), 53–63.  http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00239.x 
• Parker, T. H., Griffith, S. C., Bronstein, J. L., Fidler, F., Foster, S., Fraser, H., … Nakagawa, S. (2018). Empowering peer reviewers with a checklist to improve transparency. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 2 (June), 929–935. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0545-z
• Pillutla, M. M., & Thau, S. (2013). Organizational sciences’ obsession with “that’s interesting!”. Organizational Psychology Review, 3(2), 187–194.  http://doi.org/10.1177/2041386613479963
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology,  88(5), 879–903. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
• Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.2.93
• Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–51. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845 
• Thau, S., Pitesa, M., & Pillutla, M. (2014). Experiments in Organizational Behavior. Laboratory Experiments in the Social Sciences: Second Edition, 433–447.  http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-404681-8.00019-4.
• Wenzel, R., & Van Quaquebeke, N. (2018). The Double-Edged Sword of Big Data in Organizational and Management Research. Organizational Research Methods, 21, 548-591. http://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117718627
• Van Quaquebeke, N., Salem, M., van Dijke, M., & Wenzel, R. (in press). Conducting organizational survey and experimental research online: From convenient to ambitious in study designs, recruiting, and data quality. Organizational Psychology Review, 204138662210975. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221097571